A fully managed end-to-end service for digitally signing code, documents, and applications. (formerly Trusted Signing)
Keep the existing Action Required request and ask a Microsoft Q&A moderator to escalate it to the Artifact Signing identity-validation team for a private backend review; do not create a duplicate request.
Supported next step
The Artifact Signing FAQ identifies Azure Support or Microsoft Q&A with the artifact-signing tag as the supported assistance channels and explicitly states that creating more requests for the same entity while one is in progress does not help.^1^
Add a reply to this Q&A post requesting:
- Escalation to the Artifact Signing identity-validation team.
- Inspection of the tenant and identity to which the existing verification workflow is bound.
- Confirmation whether the workflow is incorrectly resolving the guest user to the Microsoft Accounts tenant.
- Recovery or correction of the existing validation request, without creating another request.
- A private-message channel for the identifiers and diagnostic evidence.
Microsoft Q&A cases show moderators collecting request details privately and having the validation team inspect or resolve existing Artifact Signing validation requests.^2^^3^
Provide the following only through the private channel requested by Microsoft staff:
- Azure subscription ID
- Microsoft Entra tenant ID
- Artifact Signing account resource ID and region
- Identity-validation request ID
- Guest user object ID and home-tenant/account type
- UTC timestamps of the latest failures
- The final URL path, such as
credentials.microsoft.com/verify/noPermission - Screenshot showing Microsoft Accounts as the signed-in tenant
- Browser trace/HAR if requested, after removing tokens, cookies, and unrelated personal data
Do not post verification URLs, tokens, identity documents, email addresses, or complete browser traces publicly.
Why the documented self-service fixes do not settle this case
The FAQ associates “You don't have permission to access this page” with a sign-in email that differs from the email entered in the validation request. That guidance applies to individual validation, including the individual step within organization validation.^1^ You have already established that the addresses match and that both entry points fail, so repeating the email, RBAC, directory-selection, or sign-out checks would not advance the case.
The published quickstart documents that:
- Action Required is the state in which the representative must complete the validation action.
- The primary email receives the same individual-validation link.
- Identity validation can be completed only through the portal workflow, not through Azure CLI.^4^
There is no documented CLI operation to rebind the verification link to a different tenant or identity.
Avoid replacing the current request
Do not delete or recreate it unless the validation team specifically instructs you to do so. The FAQ says duplicate in-progress requests do not help, and it directs customers to support when onboarding requires another validation for the same organization with a different primary identity.^1^
A new request is documented for conditions such as an expired seven-day email link, a failed request after a missed email, or information that must be changed. None of those conditions has been established here.
Basic support-plan limitation
Azure provides subscription-management support without a paid plan, but technical support requires a support plan.^5^ This authorization failure is a service-technical issue, so opening it as billing or subscription management solely to bypass the plan would likely misroute it.
With technical case creation unavailable, the documented service-specific route is the existing Artifact Signing-tagged Microsoft Q&A thread. Keep that thread active and request moderator escalation rather than opening parallel validation requests or unrelated support cases.
References