Licencing SQL Server 2025 in a Virtualised Environment

Gavin Harris 20 Reputation points
2026-10-30T11:46:01.2133333+00:00

Ref: https://www.microsoft.com/licensing/guidance/SQL#section-56-840

Per your licencing guide in the linked page, you provide conflicting information on licencing SQL Server on a VM.

Comparing the sections on virtualising SQL Server with the section on mobility within a server farm.

Under "Licencing by virtual machine", you state the either Software Assurance (SA) or a subscription licence is required to even have SQL Server on a VM (with core based licencing).

However, in the section "License Assignment and movement across server farms", you state that the licence is applied to the physical server that the VM runs on (no SA required) and the VM is locked to that physical server and can only be moved after 90 days. SA merely grants you the ability to move the VM freely.

So which is it? Is SA compulsory to even have SQL on a VM, or can you have a virtualised SQL Server without SA, but locked to a physical server in the farm (with the 90 day limit on movement)?

SQL Server | Other
SQL Server | Other

Additional SQL Server features and topics not covered by specific categories

0 comments No comments

Answer accepted by question author

AI answer

2026-10-30T11:47:11.2333333+00:00

Software Assurance (SA) is compulsory for SQL Server 2025 Per Core licensing by an individual VM’s virtual cores, but SQL Server can still run in a VM without SA when the deployment is licensed through an applicable physical-server entitlement or Standard Server + CAL model.

The two sections cover different licensing scopes

1. Licensing an individual VM by virtual cores

If licenses are calculated from the VM’s vCores, SQL Server 2025 requires either:

  • Perpetual core licenses with active SA, or
  • SQL Server subscription licenses.

The VM requires licenses for all allocated virtual cores, subject to a minimum of four core licenses per VM. This applies to both Standard and Enterprise editions. Without SA or a subscription, this particular licensing model is unavailable—the guide’s summary therefore shows “NA” for licensing by VM without SA.^1^

When licensed this way, active SA or subscription rights also permit the licensed virtual operating system environment (OSE) to move between servers within the same server farm as often as needed.

2. Licensing the physical host

This is not the same as assigning a few core licenses to the physical server currently hosting the VM. Under physical-core licensing, sufficient licenses must cover the physical server’s cores, with a minimum of four core licenses per physical processor.^1^

Without SA or a subscription:

  • Enterprise Edition: A fully licensed physical server may run SQL Server across physical or virtual OSEs, up to the number of assigned core licenses. For example, 16 assigned Enterprise core licenses permit SQL Server instances across up to 16 OSEs on that licensed server.
  • Standard Edition: Physical-core licensing permits SQL Server only in the server’s physical OSE, not in a VM.

With active SA or a subscription, fully licensing a physical server’s cores with Enterprise Edition provides unlimited virtualization rights. Microsoft’s SQL Server 2025 feature documentation also identifies SA as a requirement for Enterprise unlimited virtualization.^2^

Consequently:

Deployment VM allowed without SA?
Standard, Per Core, licensed by the VM’s vCores No
Enterprise, Per Core, licensed by the VM’s vCores No
Standard, physical-core licensing No—physical OSE only
Enterprise, physical-core licensing Yes, within the licensed host’s OSE entitlement
Standard, Server + CAL Yes—one physical or virtual OSE per server license, plus required CALs

What the 90-day rule means

The 90-day provision governs license assignment and reassignment; it does not create eligibility to license an individual VM by vCores without SA.

Without mobility rights, licenses assigned to a physical server generally remain assigned there for at least 90 days. A VM covered by that server’s physical licensing may run only while it remains covered by the assigned host licenses. Moving it to another host does not move those licenses automatically—the destination must already be appropriately licensed, or the licenses must be validly reassigned after the applicable restriction.^3^

This distinction matters in a cluster:

  • If every possible destination host is appropriately licensed under a physical-host model, the workload can run on a licensed destination without reassigning the same licenses.
  • If only one host is licensed and the VM migrates to an unlicensed host, the VM is not covered merely because fewer than 90 days have elapsed.
  • Reassigning the licenses to follow ordinary vMotion or Live Migration events is restricted without the applicable SA/subscription mobility rights.
  • The separate License Mobility through Software Assurance benefit concerns deployment on an Authorized Mobility Partner’s shared infrastructure; it should not be confused with routine reassignment inside your own server farm.^4^

Practical conclusion

For SQL Server 2025 Per Core:

  • To count only a VM’s virtual cores, obtain SA or subscription licenses.
  • Without SA, virtualized production SQL Server is possible through Enterprise physical-host licensing, but the VM remains within that host’s licensed OSE entitlement and does not gain free mobility.
  • Standard Per Core without SA cannot use the physical-host route to run SQL Server in a VM.
  • Alternatively, Standard Edition can use Server + CAL without SA, with one server license per permitted physical or virtual OSE and CALs for every accessing user or device.

The licensing guide is informational rather than the legal use-rights document. Validate the final design—edition, purchasing program, host core counts, cluster movement, and outsourcing status—against the current Product Terms and the applicable commercial agreement.^3^


References

  1. Licensing Resources and Documents
  2. Editions and supported features of SQL Server 2025
  3. Microsoft Product Terms
  4. License Mobility Software Assurance | Microsoft Volume Licensing
AI-generated content may be incorrect. Read our transparency notes for more information.

Was this answer helpful?

1 person found this answer helpful.

0 additional answers

Sort by: Most helpful

Your answer

Answers can be marked as 'Accepted' by the question author and 'Recommended' by moderators, which helps users know the answer solved the author's problem.