Welcome to Microsoft Q&A!
Thank you for taking the time to document the environment, event sequence, driver changes, and especially the rollback comparison in such detail
Based on the behavior you described, there is a clear correlation in your environment between installing KB5126836 and the FC/MPIO SAN disks becoming unavailable after restart.
In particular, the fact that the LUN paths remain visible at the HBA level while the disks subsequently fail with Code 10 and disappear from MPIO warrants deeper investigation of the Windows storage stack after the update.
However, the public documentation for KB5126836 does not currently document this specific FC/MPIO SAN-disk behavior as a known issue or provide a corresponding fix.
It is a recommendation verifying the storage paths, HBA status, zoning, drivers and firmware, MPIO configuration, Device Manager status, and relevant event logs when disks or MPIO paths disappear after a restart.
- Possible cause
Given the timing you documented and the fact that SAN access returned after the update was rolled back, KB5126836 is an important correlation to investigate.
However, based on the currently available public documentation, it would not be appropriate to conclude that disk.sys, classpnp.sys, the Emulex HBA driver, or another specific component is definitively responsible. The available public information also does not establish whether this behavior is limited to Emulex HBAs or can occur with QLogic HBAs.
Confirming that distinction requires analysis of diagnostic data from an affected system rather than additional configuration comparisons through the forum.
- Recommendation
Since rolling back KB5126836 has already restored SAN access in your testing, I recommend keeping the affected production systems at the last known-good state while the issue is investigated, subject to your organization's normal change-management, backup, recovery, and security requirements.
Because these LUNs are used by an Oracle RAC cluster, I would avoid making additional storage-stack or driver changes simply for troubleshooting unless they are part of a controlled test or recommended by Microsoft Support.
- Next validation step
At this point, I strongly recommend opening a Microsoft Support ticket.
I appreciate the amount of troubleshooting you have already done. Normally, I would continue narrowing down the issue here, but this particular scenario requires a deeper level of investigation to determine whether the behavior is related to the update or to an interaction within the storage stack.
Microsoft Q&A is a community support forum, so there is a practical limit to how far this type of issue can be investigated here. The MPIO troubleshooting guidance recommends contacting Microsoft Support when the documented troubleshooting does not resolve the issue and identifies diagnostic information that can be collected for further investigation.
I understand that being referred to Microsoft Support may not be the answer you were hoping for, especially after the considerable time and effort you have already spent isolating the issue. However, continuing troubleshooting through the forum would likely repeat many of the configuration checks you have already completed without providing a reliable root-cause determination.
For this reason, opening a Microsoft Support case is the most appropriate next step. This will allow the issue to receive the deeper investigation it requires through the appropriate support channel.
References:
October 13, 2026—KB5126836 (Monthly Rollup) | Microsoft Support
Multipath I/O (MPIO) Troubleshooting Guidance - Windows Server | Microsoft Learn
If you find it useful, please click Accept Answer.
Thank you for choosing Microsoft Q&A.