Recurring 0x1E bugcheck in nt!ExpPoolTrackerChargeEntry on Windows 11 25H2 (26100.8655), not fixed by KB5094135

Pat Gordon 90 Reputation points
2026-06-16T05:45:47.4066667+00:00

My Alienware 18 (model AA18250) on Windows 11 25H2 has been blue-screening repeatedly for about five weeks, and I would like it escalated since the latest cumulative update did not fix it.

Failure signature (consistent across 15+ dumps since early May):

  • Fault bucket: AV_nt!ExpPoolTrackerChargeEntry
  • WER failure hash: 6f13343d-8edf-14f9-0269-6df067c74f57
  • Bugcheck 0x1E (KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED, parameter 1 = 0xc0000005). The same function also surfaces as 0x3B, 0x23, and 0x135 depending on which subsystem trips it.
  • Triggered by many unrelated processes (explorer.exe, svchost.exe, Registry, and others), which points to the shared kernel pool allocator rather than any single third-party driver.

Analysis already done:

  • Faulting instruction is lock xadd qword ptr [r14+r8], rbp, where r8 (expected to be a PoolTrackTable entry pointer) holds different invalid values on each crash. Different garbage each time indicates a software race, not a hardware bit-flip. Caller is nt!ExpAllocatePoolWithTagFromNode+0x52.
  • ETW kernel tracing shows a burst of roughly 700,000 registry/file kernel events per second immediately before each crash (normal heavy load is 10,000 to 50,000 per second), under filesystem-filter pressure.
  • Hardware ruled out: Windows Memory Diagnostic passed two passes, Dell ePSA passed, and NVMe SMART is clean.

Why I am posting: KB5094135 (build 26100.8655, installed 6/13/2026) did not resolve it. It has recurred on this build with the identical signature on 6/14, 6/15, and 6/16.

Request: escalation to the kernel / pool-allocator team referencing failure hash 6f13343d-8edf-14f9-0269-6df067c74f57, confirmation of whether a fix is planned and in which build, and any supported interim mitigation. I can provide minidumps and the ETW capture on request.

Windows for home | Windows 11 | Performance and system failures

22 answers

Sort by: Newest
  1. 放 李 5 Reputation points
    2026-08-20T01:58:54.1333333+00:00

    I found a way to temporarily solve my BSOD problem:

    My laptop is an ROG Strix G16 (2025) G615LP with an Ultra 9 275HX CPU. I used the custom power consumption feature in Ghelper, disabling Intel Turbo Boost in Enhanced Mode and limiting the power consumption of both CPU PLs to 70W. Miraculously, it eliminated the blue screen problem on my computer, and there were no more 0x1e errors.

    I suspect that limiting power consumption wasn't the actual solution; disabling Turbo Boost was the real workaround, and perhaps this provides a temporary fix?

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.

  2. Deleted

    This answer has been deleted due to a violation of our Code of Conduct. The answer was manually reported or identified through automated detection before action was taken. Please refer to our Code of Conduct for more information.


    Comments have been turned off. Learn more

  3. Deleted

    This answer has been deleted due to a violation of our Code of Conduct. The answer was manually reported or identified through automated detection before action was taken. Please refer to our Code of Conduct for more information.


    Comments have been turned off. Learn more

  4. Konstantin Pilyugin 0 Reputation points
    2026-08-05T22:33:10.58+00:00

    I can confirm this issue on another Alienware 18 Area-51 (AA18250) Core Ultra 9 275HX, RTX 5090 Laptop, 64 GB, Windows 11 25H2 (26200.8875), BIOS 2.5.0 and bring some more, hopefully, useful details.

    16 crash incidents between 06-Jul and 28-Jul-2026, 14 bugchecks (0x1E and 0x3B, all 0xC0000005). Nine fault at the identical offset nt+0x3970b0; I extracted the code page from the minidumps and the faulting instruction is byte-for-byte lock xadd qword ptr [r14+r8],rbp (F0 4B 0F C1 2C 06) consistent with nt!ExpPoolTrackerChargeEntry.

    Ruled out on this poor bastard machine: RAM (MemTest86, 15 passes / 46h / 0 errors), third-party drivers (one crash occurred with Driver Verifier special pool active on all non-Microsoft drivers, no verifier bugcheck, no driver named), storage, OS files (SFC/DISM; crashes continued). Crash frequency scales with background event load (worst during Dell SupportAssist scans, 6 crashes in one day); victims are whatever (svchost, WmiPrvSE, python, msiexec, the kernel Registry process).

    Sharing some of the dumps https://1drv.ms/f/c/75f3aaea5fd80eb3/IgBE7SxUVna5RL28nZJnlzIeAdsyePfxTkSuHMkR4bqw0FU?e=Jvn2pv I believe those should be enough for anyone interested

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments

  5. Corey F 0 Reputation points
    2026-07-30T14:08:51.9633333+00:00

    Additional Data Point — Enterprise Workstation (Dell Pro Max 18 Plus).

    6 of 7 crash dumps analyzed were on Core #3

    I'm adding my crash data to this thread. My system shows exact WER hash matches with the crashes documented here:

    • System: Dell Pro Max 18 Plus, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (Arrow Lake-HX), 64GB DDR5-6400
    • WER Hash #1: 6f13343d-8edf-14f9-0269-6df067c74f57 — matches your thread exactly (pool tracker crash, ExpInsertPoolTrackerExpansion)
    • WER Hash #2: 8fa640fb-ac7d-0364-d6b2-2a35233c70d6 — MiExamineZeroChunks crash with hypervisor present
    • Total crashes: 11 dumps collected over 9 weeks (June–July 2026)
    • Trigger: WSL2 (Hyper-V virtualization) consistently triggers crashes; native workloads without WSL2 run most stable, but not always
    • Pattern: Multiple crash signatures all fault at ExpPoolTrackerChargeEntry+0x40 — the pool tracker expansion function, consistent with a race condition in ExpInsertPoolTrackerExpansion under heavy concurrent allocation pressure from WSL2's kernel activity across 24 cores. Core clustering is evident: out of the analyzed dumps, 6 crashed on Core 3 and 1 on Core 17, matching the hardware fault patterns described in this thread.
    • Security drivers present (McAfee/Trellix, BeyondTrust/Avecto) but appear to be bystanders based on the same WER hashes appearing on systems running different or no EDR drivers.

    Happy to provide dump analysis details if it helps escalate to the kernel team.

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments

Your answer

Answers can be marked as 'Accepted' by the question author and 'Recommended' by moderators, which helps users know the answer solved the author's problem.