An Azure service that enables hosting Domain Name System (DNS) domains in Azure.
Hi Carlo Castillo & thx for join me at Q&A platform,
u've already done a pretty good job isolating this. If both IPv4 and IPv6 connections time out before TCP 443 is established, and the same Front Door addresses work from other networks, I'd focus on the network path between the affected AT&T connection and Microsoft's anycast edge.
This doesn't look like a WAF, certificate, origin health, or Front Door routing-rule problem. Those components operate after the connection reaches the relevant processing stage. The absence of an HTTP response and X-Azure-Ref is consistent with the connection failing earlier.
Regarding known issues, I couldn't verify a publicly confirmed AT&T-to-Azure Front Door routing incident affecting those specific IP ranges. But that doesn't rule out a localized peering, routing, or filtering problem. Anycast makes this particularly interesting because the same destination IP can be routed to different Microsoft edge locations depending on the source network.
There's another detail I wouldn't ignore: restarting the customer's router temporarily restored connectivity. That makes the customer's gateway, its connection state, or a change in the ISP-assigned address or routing path worth investigating. It doesn't prove the router is responsible, though.
For diagnostics, I'd capture traffic on the affected client using Wireshark or tcpdump while attempting a connection. The key is to establish whether TCP SYN packets leave the client and whether SYN-ACK responses ever return.
I'd also test individual Front Door IPs while preserving the original hostname and TLS SNI, for example:
curl -4 -v --connect-timeout 10 --resolve example.com:443:150.171.109.67 https://example.com/
Repeat against the other observed IPv4 addresses and compare with a working connection. For IPv6, use the corresponding resolved IPv6 address.
That helps determine whether the failure affects every returned destination or only particular anycast addresses.
Regarding visibility, Azure Front Door customer access logs don't expose raw TCP SYN attempts or connections that never produce an HTTP request. So there's no customer-facing Log Analytics query that can reliably show these failed handshakes. Microsoft engineering may have additional network telemetry, but its availability and retention would need to be confirmed through Support.
I'd open an Azure Front Door networking support case and provide the affected customer's public source IP, destination IPs, exact UTC timestamps, IPv4/IPv6 test results, and packet captures if permitted. Ask engineering to investigate edge reachability and routing for that source network.
In parallel, AT&T should investigate the same source/destination pairs. Ideally, both providers need to compare where the traffic stops. Ordinary traceroute results from that customer's gateway aren't useful here, particularly when the gateway rejects traceroute probes to otherwise reachable destinations.
As for mitigation, you can't select or pin specific Front Door anycast IPs or PoPs for an individual tenant. Changing DNS to another currently returned Front Door IP isn't a dependable fix because the underlying routing and anycast behavior can change.
A temporary alternative access path, such as a separately hosted endpoint outside the affected Front Door path, could help critical users, but that requires its own DNS, TLS, security, and origin configuration. I wouldn't make production DNS changes without first validating that alternative from an affected AT&T connection.
The strongest evidence here is the combination of successful DNS resolution, TCP connection timeouts, working access from other networks, and temporary recovery after a router restart.
I'd treat this as a client-to-edge reachability investigation involving both Microsoft and AT&T, rather than spending more time changing Front Door WAF or origin settings.
rgds,
Alex
p.s. if my answer is help - pls mark it as an answer