Welcome to Microsoft Q&A!
Thank you for taking the time to provide the ISO filename, file size, calculated SHA256 values, and the dates associated with the download and verification document.
Based on the information you provided, holding the installation until the checksum can be verified is the appropriate approach.
Microsoft’s Evaluation Center instructs customers to calculate the SHA256 hash of the downloaded ISO and compare it with the hash published for that evaluation image. When the values match, this provides verification that the downloaded file has not been corrupted, tampered with, or altered.
In this case, the SHA256 you calculated for the currently served ARM64 ISO does not match the value in the verification document linked from the Evaluation Center. Therefore, based on the currently available public documentation, we cannot reliably confirm that the published checksum applies to this specific ISO.
The most likely explanation is that the ARM64 evaluation ISO was refreshed to a newer build while the linked verification document still contains the checksum for an earlier image. The difference between the document date and the ISO build date is consistent with that possibility. However, this should be treated only as a likely explanation, not as confirmation that the current ISO is valid. A checksum calculated independently from the download cannot be considered an official Microsoft checksum until Microsoft publishes or confirms the corresponding value.
For reference, the reported information is:
- ISO: 26100.*****-0331.ge_release_svc_refresh_CLIENT_IOT_LTSC_EVAL_A64FRE_en-us.iso
- File size: 5,042,****bytes
- Calculated SHA256: 3dcdba9c9c0*********
- SHA256 in the currently linked verification document: ccec358a760c3c5812*******
Moreover, I want to be transparent about the limitation of Microsoft Q&A in this situation. Microsoft Q&A is a public community support forum. While I can help review published documentation and identify an apparent inconsistency such as this one, I do not have the authority or product-team access required to certify an unpublished ISO checksum or confirm that the download backend and verification document are out of sync.
For that reason, rather than providing an unverified hash as an official answer, I recommend continuing to hold the installation until Microsoft provides an authoritative checksum for the exact ISO.
If you would like Microsoft to investigate and correct the public download or verification information, you can submit the issue through Feedback Hub.
If you require an authoritative response for deployment or need the issue investigated directly, please open a Microsoft Support ticket and provide the ISO filename, file size, both SHA256 values, the Evaluation Center and verification-document links, and the fact that you reproduced the calculated hash using two independent tools.
Once Microsoft publishes or provides the SHA256 for the exact ISO above, calculate the SHA256 again against a freshly downloaded copy and confirm that the values match before proceeding with installation. If Microsoft replaces the ISO instead, download the replacement and verify it against the checksum published for that specific image.
I understand this may not provide the immediate confirmation you were hoping for. However, given that checksum verification is specifically intended to establish the integrity and authenticity of the installation media, it would be better not to make an assumption where the currently published Microsoft information does not provide a matching value.
Reference: Please select your Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC download
If you find it useful, please click Accept Answer.
Thank you for choosing Microsoft Q&A.